I also object to our condo's reclassification by the County without notifying me. How many other owners/part-time residents, who do not rent their units, are being negatively affected?

Last year, 1,904 properties benefited from the condominium classification program that was amended by ordinances 5159 and 5160.  Of those 1,904 properties, it is estimated that just over 400 properties are rented long-term.

Show All Answers

1. Why did my classification change from Non-Owner-Occupied to Short-Term Rental?
2. Are there any exceptions to being classified as Short-Term Rental?
3. My property is located in Puamana, why did my classification change from Non-Owner-Occupied to Short-Term Rental?
4. Why was this change made?
5. Why was an exception made for long-term rentals?
6. Where can I get a copy of the ordinance?
7. It appears that this ordinance is penalizing me by classifying my unit as a short- term rental. Why are we being lumped in with others who use their units as short-term rentals?
8. I also object to our condo's reclassification by the County without notifying me. How many other owners/part-time residents, who do not rent their units, are being negatively affected?
9. Could you explain the rationale for this?